June 1st, 2000

...now browsing by day

 

“Right-to-Work” VS Union Security

Thursday, June 1st, 2000

Washington is among the 29 States that have no “right-to-Work” law. These laws ban collectively bargained, union security agreements that require workers to pay for union representation. In other words, workers cannot negotiate contract provisions that insist all employees covered under that contract join the union (referred to as a “union shop.”) According to a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court decision: “A union shop arrangement has been thought to distribute fairly the cost of these (representative) activities among those who benefit, and it counteracts the incentive that employees might otherwise have to become “free riders”—to refuse to contribute to the union while obtaining benefits of union representation that necessarily accrue to all employees.” The idea is that everyone benefits from the contract and its protections, so everyone should pay their fair share of the cost of union representation. Click to continue »