Politics

...now browsing by category

 

Interview with a Lobbyist

Sunday, July 1st, 2007

Recently CWA Local 7804 Investigative Reporter sat down to an interview with its own Secretary-Treasurer, Jake Williams.  Along with his responsibilities to his office which include tracking all financial transactions, meeting minutes, and grievance issues, Jake has been 7804’s representative for CWA Washington State Labor Council.  He has been in the position for over one year along with retiree Gail Love from the Olympia local.  We wanted to get a better understanding of just what exactly this entailed. Click to continue »

What is the Employee Free Choice Act?

Sunday, April 1st, 2007
  1. America’s workers want to form unions.
    Research shows Nearly 60 million would form a union tomorrow if given the chance.
  2. Too few ever get that chance because employers routinely block their efforts to form unions-and our current legal system is too broken to stop them. As many as one-quarter of employers illegally fire workers who try to form unions.
  3. The Employee Free Choice Act would give workers a fair chance to form unions to improve their lives by:
    • Allowing them to form unions by signing cards authorizing union representation
    • Providing mediation and arbitration for first-contract disputes
    • Establishing stronger penalties for violation of employee rights when workers seek to form a union and during first-contract negotiations.
  4. In the 110th Congress, the Employee Free Choice Act has widespread support.
  5. More than three quarters of Americans 77% support strong laws that give employees the freedom to make their own choice about whether to have a union in their workplace without interference from management.
  6. Allowing working people to choose for themselves whether to have a union is the key step toward rebuilding America’s middle class. Union membership brings better wages and benefits and a real voice on the job. It’s no accident that the 25 year decline in workers wages in our country has paralleled a 25 year slide in the size of the America’s unions.
  7. The Employee Free Choice Act would put democracy back into the workplace. Majority sign-up would ensure the decision whether to form a union was made by majority choice, not by the employer unilaterally.
  8. Workers can still vote under the Employee Free Choice Act. At any time, if 30 percent of the workers wan an election, they can have one. And once they have a union, workers also vote to elect their union representatives.
  9. The Employee Free Choice Act has the support of hundreds of respected organizations and individuals-major religious denominations, academics and civil and human rights groups and others.
  10. The AFL-CIO union movement is working in many ways to restore good jobs, health care and retirement security-but passing the Employee Free Choice Act is our top priority because we cannot create balance for working people or rebuild the middle class unless workers genuinely have the freedom to form unions for a better life.

Association of Flight Attendants AFA-CWA

Saturday, July 1st, 2006

After a week of intense bargaining and a final marathon session, the Association of Flight Attendants-CWA (AFA-CWA) and Northwest Airlines reached a new tentative agreement early July 17, 2006. Negotiators reached the agreement in time to avoid rejection of the existing flight attendant contract, as had been authorized by the bankruptcy court. “With the airline in bankruptcy, this deal was always going to be about survival,” said Mollie Reiley, Northwest Interim Master Executive council (MEC) President. “We left no stone unturned and have made a significant difference together, but this is not a day that we celebrate. We have an agreement that will give flight attendants hope for the future and one that allows us to fight another day.” Click to continue »

Association of Flight Attendants AFA-CWA

Monday, May 1st, 2006

The Association of Flight Attendants are CWA Members.

Leave All Blades Behind Takes Step Towards Law

Washington, DC, March 17 2006 – The Congressional Subcommittee on Economic Security, Infrastructure Protection and Cyber security yesterday accepted Rep. Edward Markey’s (D-MA) Leave All Blades Behind amendment, bringing it one step closer to reaching the House floor. The amendment was attached to the Transportation Security Administration (TSA) reform bill that will now go before the Committee on Homeland Security for approval. Click to continue »

What is FMLA?

Thursday, July 1st, 2004

Answer:

The Family and Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) provides certain employees with up to 12 workweeks of unpaid, job-protected leave a year, and requires group health benefits to be maintained during the leave as if employees continued to work instead of taking leave. This Compliance Guide summarizes the FMLA provisions and regulations, and provides answers to the most frequently asked questions. More detail on the FMLA may be found in the regulations (see Links Page on Local’s website) Click to continue »

Dear Working Families e-Activist

Monday, March 1st, 2004

Last week we reported to you that the Bush overtime pay take-away is likely to be finalized by President Bush and Labor Secretary Elaine Chao before the end of March. An announcement could come as soon as this Friday. Click to continue »

The Avalanche Effect

Thursday, January 1st, 2004

After nearly 15 years of work and near completion of a national ergonomics standard, on October 29, 2003, the National Safety Council (NSC) surrendered its sponsorship of the American National Standards Institute (ANSI) Ergonomics Standard (Z365). By withdrawing its sponsorship of the standard and the almost impossible task of finding another sponsoring organization, the standard-setting activity ends. In claiming that the continuation of its sponsorship presented a serious financial burden, the NSC has bowed to the pressures and desires of many employers (such as IBM, Anheuser-Busch companies, Fed-Ex, UPS, and Emerson Electric) and their representative organizations (such as the National Coalition on Ergonomics, The United States Chamber of Commerce, the National Association of Manufacturers, the Association of American Railroads, and the Food Marketing Institute) to not pursue the development and completion of a national ergonomics standard. This decision, which was opposed by the majority of the members of the committee, including all of the labor representatives, has been viewed as short-sighted and solely in the interests of that portion of the business community that has refused to acknowledge the importance of workplace ergonomics. Of particular concern, the NSC’s action brings into the question its degree of commitment to worker safety and health. Click to continue »

“Right-to-Work” VS Union Security

Thursday, June 1st, 2000

Washington is among the 29 States that have no “right-to-Work” law. These laws ban collectively bargained, union security agreements that require workers to pay for union representation. In other words, workers cannot negotiate contract provisions that insist all employees covered under that contract join the union (referred to as a “union shop.”) According to a 1977 U.S. Supreme Court decision: “A union shop arrangement has been thought to distribute fairly the cost of these (representative) activities among those who benefit, and it counteracts the incentive that employees might otherwise have to become “free riders”—to refuse to contribute to the union while obtaining benefits of union representation that necessarily accrue to all employees.” The idea is that everyone benefits from the contract and its protections, so everyone should pay their fair share of the cost of union representation. Click to continue »